Featured Cases

Court Case
Sep 25, 2025
Placeholder image
  • Police Practices and Police Misconduct|
  • +1 Issue

Escobar Molina v. Dep’t of Homeland Security – Challenging Warrantless Immigration Arrests Without Probable Cause in D.C.

On September 25, 2025, four Washington, D.C. community members and the national immigration organization CASA sued the Trump administration to end its policy and practice of making immigration arrests in D.C. without a warrant and without probable cause. The plaintiffs are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of the District of Columbia, American Civil Liberties Union, Amica Center for Immigrants’ Rights, CASA, National Immigration Project, the Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs, and the law firm of Covington & Burling. Since August, federal officers from multiple agencies have made hundreds of immigration arrests in the District. The officers frequently patrol and set up checkpoints in neighborhoods where a large number of immigrants live and stop and arrest people as they go about their daily lives. The law typically requires an agent to have a warrant when arresting someone for an immigration violation. One exception to the warrant requirement is when the agent has probable cause both that a person is in the United States in violation of the law and is likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained. According to the lawsuit, the Trump administration has a policy and practice of making immigration arrests without a warrant and without an individualized determination of probable cause that the person is in the country unlawfully and that the person is a flight risk. Each plaintiff in the case was arrested, detained, and released. The lawsuit was filed as a class action. The plaintiffs seek a court ruling to prevent the government from conducting such unlawful arrests against them and others in the future. On October 3, 2025, Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification and a motion for a preliminary injunction, to stay agency action, and for provisional class certification to ask the Court to order Defendants and their agents to stop making warrantless immigration arrests without probable cause for flight risk, as required by the Immigration and Nationality Act.

All Cases

39 Court Cases
Court Case
Oct 13, 2017
Placeholder image
  • Religious Liberty|
  • +2 Issues

J.D. v. Azar (formerly Garza v. Azar and Garza v. Hargan) - Challenging Trump Administration’s Refusal to Permit Teenage Immigration Detainees to Access Abortion Services

Court Case
Aug 03, 2017
Placeholder image
  • Due Process/Procedural Rights|
  • +2 Issues

Almaqrami v. Blinken (formerly P.K. v. Tillerson) - Challenging Refusal To Process Certain Countries’ Nationals Who Won “Diversity Visa” Lottery

Court Case
Mar 07, 2016
Placeholder image
  • Due Process/Procedural Rights|
  • +1 Issue

Bado v. United States

Court Case
Dec 15, 2014
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants' Rights

R.I.L-R. v. Johnson

Court Case
Aug 15, 2014
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants' Rights|
  • +2 Issues

M.S.P.C. v. Johnson

Court Case
Jun 15, 2013
Placeholder image
  • Equal Protection and Discrimination|
  • +1 Issue

ACLU of Southern California v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

Court Case
Jan 02, 2013
Placeholder image
  • Equal Protection and Discrimination|
  • +2 Issues

Home Care Association of America v. Weil

Court Case
Jun 12, 2012
Placeholder image
  • Due Process/Procedural Rights|
  • +3 Issues

Fretes-Zarate v. United States

Court Case
Aug 30, 2011
Placeholder image
  • Voting Rights|
  • +2 Issues

Florida v. United States