• About
    • About Us
    • Issues
    • Careers
    • Volunteer
  • Our Work
    • Know Your Rights
    • Legislative Testimony
    • Cases
    • Reports
  • News
    • Press Releases
    • Blogs
  • Get Help
  • Events
  • Donate
    • Become a Member
    • Donate
    • Other Ways to Donate
  • Donate
    • Become a Member
    • Donate
    • Other Ways to Donate

Court Cases

  • Share this page
      • Amicus Filed
      • Closed
      • In U.S. Supreme Court
      • Landmark case
      • Lost
      • Open
      • Victory!
      • D.C. Statehood
      • Immigrants' Rights
      • LGBTQ+ Rights
      • Police Practices and Police Misconduct
      • National Security/War on Terror
      • Freedom of Speech and Association
      • Youth/Childrens' Rights
      • Religious Liberty
      • Reproductive Freedom
      • Government Employees' Rights
      • Women's Rights/Gender Equity
      • Privacy
      • Equal Protection and Discrimination
      • Disability Rights
      • Due Process/Procedural Rights
      • Criminal Justice Reform
      • Voting Rights
      • Racial Justice
Filter by Status: Victory!
    • Amicus Filed
    • Closed
    • In U.S. Supreme Court
    • Landmark case
    • Lost
    • Open
    • Victory!
    • D.C. Statehood
    • Immigrants' Rights
    • LGBTQ+ Rights
    • Police Practices and Police Misconduct
    • National Security/War on Terror
    • Freedom of Speech and Association
    • Youth/Childrens' Rights
    • Religious Liberty
    • Reproductive Freedom
    • Government Employees' Rights
    • Women's Rights/Gender Equity
    • Privacy
    • Equal Protection and Discrimination
    • Disability Rights
    • Due Process/Procedural Rights
    • Criminal Justice Reform
    • Voting Rights
    • Racial Justice

All Cases

112 Court Cases
Court Case
Aug 10, 2023
Placeholder image
  • Criminal Justice Reform|
  • +1 Issue

Benjamin v. Colbert – Challenging D.C. Jail’s Failure to Provide Religious Dietary Accommodations

The lawsuit, filed as a class action, primarily seeks a court order to prohibit DOC officials from imposing requirements on Jewish people in their custody to provide external verification of their religion as a condition for approving their kosher meal requests.
Court Case
Mar 22, 2023
Placeholder image
  • Equal Protection and Discrimination|
  • +1 Issue

SONMEZ V. WASHINGTON POST – IS AN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLAIM AGAINST A NEWSPAPER A SLAPP?

Court Case
Apr 08, 2022
Placeholder image
  • National Security/War on Terror

ACLU V. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE – FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT CASE REGARDING AUTHORITY TO SEIZE AFGHAN FUNDS

Court Case
Mar 03, 2022
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants' Rights|
  • +2 Issues

ESCALANTE V. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT - SEEKING COVID-19 BOOSTER SHOTS FOR MEDICALLY VULNERABLE ICE DETAINEES (Second Case)

The ACLU-DC filed a lawsuit on behalf of five people in ICE detention facilities who are medically vulnerable to severe illness and death in the event of COVID-19 infection, demanding that they be given COVID-19 booster shots.
Court Case
Feb 15, 2022
Placeholder image
  • Criminal Justice Reform

ACLU V. U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE – SEEKING TO UNCOVER AN IMPROPER SCHEME TO OPERATE A PRIVATE DETENTION FACILITY

Court Case
Feb 07, 2022
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants' Rights|
  • +2 Issues

AAMIR SHAIKH V. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) – SEEKING COVID-19 BOOSTER SHOTS FOR MEDICALLY VULNERABLE ICE DETAINEES

The ACLU-DC filed this lawsuit, together with the ACLU’s National Prison Project and Immigrants’ Rights Project, on behalf of five medically vulnerable people detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) who have requested and been denied COVID-19 vaccine booster shots.
Court Case
Nov 29, 2021
Placeholder image
  • Criminal Justice Reform

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION V. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (CARES Act FOIA)

Under the Freedom of Information Act, the National ACLU and ACLU-DC requested records providing information about people BOP moved to home confinement under the CARES Act, and for any DOJ and BOP policies implementing the OLC Memorandum.
Court Case
Oct 04, 2021
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Mashaud v. Boone – What Does “Constitutionally Protected Activity" Mean in the D.C. Stalking Law?

Apparently recognizing that a law making “communicat[ion]” a crime risks the prosecution of speech protected by the First Amendment, the law provides that “[t]his section does not apply to constitutionally protected activity.” But the D.C. Court of Appeals has never explained what that means.
Court Case
May 12, 2021
Placeholder image
  • Equal Protection and Discrimination|
  • +2 Issues

Kirton v. Mayorkas – Challenging Overly an Narrow Interpretation of Federal Employment Discrimination Law

Alicia Kirton, a FEMA budget analyst, was denied full-time telework status even though her work could be done remotely and a white man with the same job had been granted telework status for years.
Court Case
Aug 10, 2023
Placeholder image
Court Case
Aug 10, 2023
  • Criminal Justice Reform|
  • +1 Issue

Benjamin v. Colbert – Challenging D.C. Jail’s Failure to Provide Religious Dietary Accommodations

The lawsuit, filed as a class action, primarily seeks a court order to prohibit DOC officials from imposing requirements on Jewish people in their custody to provide external verification of their religion as a condition for approving their kosher meal requests.
Explore Case
Court Case
Mar 22, 2023
Placeholder image
Court Case
Mar 22, 2023
  • Equal Protection and Discrimination|
  • +1 Issue

SONMEZ V. WASHINGTON POST – IS AN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLAIM AGAINST A NEWSPAPER A SLAPP?

Explore Case
Court Case
Apr 08, 2022
Placeholder image
Court Case
Apr 08, 2022
  • National Security/War on Terror

ACLU V. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE – FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT CASE REGARDING AUTHORITY TO SEIZE AFGHAN FUNDS

Explore Case
Court Case
Mar 03, 2022
Placeholder image
Court Case
Mar 03, 2022
  • Immigrants' Rights|
  • +2 Issues

ESCALANTE V. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT - SEEKING COVID-19 BOOSTER SHOTS FOR MEDICALLY VULNERABLE ICE DETAINEES (Second Case)

The ACLU-DC filed a lawsuit on behalf of five people in ICE detention facilities who are medically vulnerable to severe illness and death in the event of COVID-19 infection, demanding that they be given COVID-19 booster shots.
Explore Case
Court Case
Feb 15, 2022
Placeholder image
Court Case
Feb 15, 2022
  • Criminal Justice Reform

ACLU V. U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE – SEEKING TO UNCOVER AN IMPROPER SCHEME TO OPERATE A PRIVATE DETENTION FACILITY

Explore Case
Court Case
Feb 07, 2022
Placeholder image
Court Case
Feb 07, 2022
  • Immigrants' Rights|
  • +2 Issues

AAMIR SHAIKH V. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) – SEEKING COVID-19 BOOSTER SHOTS FOR MEDICALLY VULNERABLE ICE DETAINEES

The ACLU-DC filed this lawsuit, together with the ACLU’s National Prison Project and Immigrants’ Rights Project, on behalf of five medically vulnerable people detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) who have requested and been denied COVID-19 vaccine booster shots.
Explore Case
Court Case
Nov 29, 2021
Placeholder image
Court Case
Nov 29, 2021
  • Criminal Justice Reform

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION V. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (CARES Act FOIA)

Under the Freedom of Information Act, the National ACLU and ACLU-DC requested records providing information about people BOP moved to home confinement under the CARES Act, and for any DOJ and BOP policies implementing the OLC Memorandum.
Explore Case
Court Case
Oct 04, 2021
Placeholder image
Court Case
Oct 04, 2021
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Mashaud v. Boone – What Does “Constitutionally Protected Activity" Mean in the D.C. Stalking Law?

Apparently recognizing that a law making “communicat[ion]” a crime risks the prosecution of speech protected by the First Amendment, the law provides that “[t]his section does not apply to constitutionally protected activity.” But the D.C. Court of Appeals has never explained what that means.
Explore Case
Court Case
May 12, 2021
Placeholder image
Court Case
May 12, 2021
  • Equal Protection and Discrimination|
  • +2 Issues

Kirton v. Mayorkas – Challenging Overly an Narrow Interpretation of Federal Employment Discrimination Law

Alicia Kirton, a FEMA budget analyst, was denied full-time telework status even though her work could be done remotely and a white man with the same job had been granted telework status for years.
Explore Case
1 2 3 4 5 … 13

Stay Informed

Sign up to be the first to hear about how to take action.

By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy statement.

By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy statement.

  • ACLU National
  • Volunteer
  • Contact Us
  • Donate

© 2025 American Civil Liberties Union

  • User Agreement
  • Privacy Statement
  • Website Accessibility