All Cases

72 Court Cases
Court Case
May 29, 2026
Placeholder image
  • Voting Rights

State Board of Election Comm'rs v. Miss. NAACP - Fighting To Preserve Enforceability of the Voting Rights Act

A unanimous three-judge panel concluded that Mississippi’s 2022 state legislative districting plan violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (“VRA”) by cracking and diluting Black voting strength in three areas of the State. The state appealed to the Supreme Court, claiming that the injured voters here—and every Section 2 voter-plaintiff for the past sixty years—had no right to sue in the first place. The ACLU-DC joined the case at the Supreme Court stage to help argue, together with the National ACLU, the ACLU of Mississippi, and other partners, that Section 2 of the VRA is enforceable by voters and not just (as the state claims) by the U.S. Attorney General. In the last four decades, private litigants, not the Attorney General, have brought the overwhelming majority of VRA Sec. 2 cases. Mississippi's radical argument would transform voting rights law and reduce VRA enforcement to whatever suits the Justice Department had time — or was politically motivated to — to file. In October 2025, we filed a motion to summarily affirm the decision of the district court and confirm voters' ability to enforce Section 2 of the VRA. In May 2026, the Supreme Court summarily reversed and remanded for reconsideration in light of Louisiana v. Callais, 146 S. Ct. 1131 (2026), which did not address enforceability but overhauled the substantive requirements for a successful Section 2 claim, making such claims much more difficult to win on the merits. Justice Jackson dissented from the remand order, pointing out that Callais was irrelevant to the question of enforceability. The case now heads back to the federal district court in Mississippi.
Court Case
Jul 23, 2025
Placeholder image
  • National Security/War on Terror

CONNELL V. CIA – MISUSE OF THE “GLOMAR” RESPONSE

Court Case
Mar 07, 2025
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants' Rights

ESCALONA V. NOEM – SEEKING TO STOP TRANSFERS OF IMMIGRATION DETAINEES TO GUANTANAMO

Court Case
Oct 28, 2024
Placeholder image
  • Criminal Justice Reform|
  • +2 Issues

K.Y. v. District of Columbia - challenging juvenile justice agency's warehousing of children in jail-like setting for months instead of promptly beginning rehabilitative placements

Court Case
Sep 07, 2023
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association|
  • +1 Issue

Molina v. Book – Advancing the right to observe police, and challenging qualified immunity doctrine, which shields officials from constitutional accountability

In 2015, police officers shot tear gas at two legal observers with bright green "Legal Observer" hats. The court ruled that words printed on clothing are not entitled to First Amendment protections. Together with the National ACLU and the ACLU of Missouri, we petitioned SCOTUS to review the case.
Court Case
Oct 12, 2022
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants' Rights|
  • +1 Issue

ACLU V. DEP’T OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND ICE

Court Case
Jul 24, 2020
Placeholder image
  • Due Process/Procedural Rights|
  • +2 Issues

Texas Civil Rights Project v. Wolf -- Defending due process rights for children seeking refuge in U.S. during COVID19 pandemic

Court Case
Apr 14, 2020
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants' Rights|
  • +2 Issues

Nora v. Wolf - Challenging the Policy of Deporting Immigrants to One of the Most Dangerous Regions in the World to Await Their Asylum Hearings

The ACLU-DC co-represents 26 asylum seekers—12 adults and their 14 minor children—who are unlawfully trapped in life-threatening conditions in Tamaulipas, Mexico, while they wait for their asylum proceedings in the United States to conclude.
Court Case
Dec 05, 2019
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants' Rights|
  • +2 Issues

Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center v. Wolf - Challenging Denial of Immigrants’ Access to Counsel