• About
    • About Us
    • Issues
    • Careers
    • Volunteer
  • Our Work
    • Know Your Rights
    • Legislative Testimony
    • Cases
    • Reports
  • News
    • Press Releases
    • Blogs
  • Get Help
  • Events
  • Donate
    • Become a Member
    • Donate
    • Other Ways to Donate
  • Donate
    • Become a Member
    • Donate
    • Other Ways to Donate

Court Cases

  • Share this page
      • Amicus Filed
      • Closed
      • In U.S. Supreme Court
      • Landmark case
      • Lost
      • Open
      • Victory!
      • D.C. Statehood
      • Immigrants' Rights
      • LGBTQ+ Rights
      • Police Practices and Police Misconduct
      • National Security/War on Terror
      • Freedom of Speech and Association
      • Youth/Childrens' Rights
      • Religious Liberty
      • Reproductive Freedom
      • Government Employees' Rights
      • Women's Rights/Gender Equity
      • Privacy
      • Equal Protection and Discrimination
      • Disability Rights
      • Due Process/Procedural Rights
      • Criminal Justice Reform
      • Voting Rights
      • Racial Justice
Filter by Issue: Freedom of...
    • Amicus Filed
    • Closed
    • In U.S. Supreme Court
    • Landmark case
    • Lost
    • Open
    • Victory!
    • D.C. Statehood
    • Immigrants' Rights
    • LGBTQ+ Rights
    • Police Practices and Police Misconduct
    • National Security/War on Terror
    • Freedom of Speech and Association
    • Youth/Childrens' Rights
    • Religious Liberty
    • Reproductive Freedom
    • Government Employees' Rights
    • Women's Rights/Gender Equity
    • Privacy
    • Equal Protection and Discrimination
    • Disability Rights
    • Due Process/Procedural Rights
    • Criminal Justice Reform
    • Voting Rights
    • Racial Justice

All Cases

70 Court Cases
Court Case
Apr 16, 2025
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Mahoney v. U.S. Capitol Police Board – Defending Courts’ Authority To Enjoin a Law that Facially Violates the First Amendment

Court Case
Mar 26, 2025
Placeholder image
  • Equal Protection and Discrimination|
  • +4 Issues

STAINNAK V. TRUMP – CHALLENGING PURGE OF DEI-ASSOCIATED FEDERAL WORKERS AS DISCRIMINATORY AND RETALIATORY FOR PERCEIVED POLITICAL BELIEFS

Federal employees filed a complaint against the Trump administration for targeting workers, especially people of color, women, and non-binary workers, for participating in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) activities, violating their First Amendment rights.
Court Case
Apr 24, 2024
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Arab Student Union of Jackson-Reed High School v. District of Columbia - Challenging suppression of pro-Palestinian student speech

The Arab Student Union’s activities would not be disruptive; they are the same kinds of activities in which other student clubs engage. Their speech has been suppressed because the school does not want their viewpoint to be heard.
Court Case
Dec 12, 2023
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

WALLBUILDERS V. WMATA – CHALLENGING METRO POLICY OF BANNING CONTROVERSIAL ADVERTISEMENTS

In this case, we argue that WMATA’s advertising guidelines violate the First Amendment, which prohibits government agencies from discriminating against private speech based on its viewpoint or from applying rules that so vague they can’t be applied consistently.
Court Case
Nov 13, 2023
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Banks v. Hoffman - Advocating for robust protection against lawsuits used to chill speech

In December of 2010, the D.C. Council passed, with our support, an Anti-SLAPP Act that provides a special procedure for people engaged in advocacy on public interest issues to have a court dismiss SLAPP suits quickly.
Court Case
Oct 25, 2023
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

United States v. Trump (challenging vague and broad gag order against criminal defendant

Court Case
Sep 07, 2023
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association|
  • +1 Issue

Molina v. Book – Advancing the right to observe police, and challenging qualified immunity doctrine, which shields officials from constitutional accountability

In 2015, police officers shot tear gas at two legal observers with bright green "Legal Observer" hats. The court ruled that words printed on clothing are not entitled to First Amendment protections. Together with the National ACLU and the ACLU of Missouri, we petitioned SCOTUS to review the case.
Court Case
Mar 22, 2023
Placeholder image
  • Equal Protection and Discrimination|
  • +1 Issue

SONMEZ V. WASHINGTON POST – IS AN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLAIM AGAINST A NEWSPAPER A SLAPP?

Court Case
Nov 04, 2021
Placeholder image
  • Police Practices and Police Misconduct|
  • +2 Issues

Cameron v. District of Columbia – Challenging Practice of Needlessly Retaining Arrested Individuals' Cell Phones for Months or Years Without Process

Court Case
Apr 16, 2025
Placeholder image
Court Case
Apr 16, 2025
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Mahoney v. U.S. Capitol Police Board – Defending Courts’ Authority To Enjoin a Law that Facially Violates the First Amendment

Explore Case
Court Case
Mar 26, 2025
Placeholder image
Court Case
Mar 26, 2025
  • Equal Protection and Discrimination|
  • +4 Issues

STAINNAK V. TRUMP – CHALLENGING PURGE OF DEI-ASSOCIATED FEDERAL WORKERS AS DISCRIMINATORY AND RETALIATORY FOR PERCEIVED POLITICAL BELIEFS

Federal employees filed a complaint against the Trump administration for targeting workers, especially people of color, women, and non-binary workers, for participating in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) activities, violating their First Amendment rights.
Explore Case
Court Case
Apr 24, 2024
Placeholder image
Court Case
Apr 24, 2024
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Arab Student Union of Jackson-Reed High School v. District of Columbia - Challenging suppression of pro-Palestinian student speech

The Arab Student Union’s activities would not be disruptive; they are the same kinds of activities in which other student clubs engage. Their speech has been suppressed because the school does not want their viewpoint to be heard.
Explore Case
Court Case
Dec 12, 2023
Placeholder image
Court Case
Dec 12, 2023
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

WALLBUILDERS V. WMATA – CHALLENGING METRO POLICY OF BANNING CONTROVERSIAL ADVERTISEMENTS

In this case, we argue that WMATA’s advertising guidelines violate the First Amendment, which prohibits government agencies from discriminating against private speech based on its viewpoint or from applying rules that so vague they can’t be applied consistently.
Explore Case
Court Case
Nov 13, 2023
Placeholder image
Court Case
Nov 13, 2023
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Banks v. Hoffman - Advocating for robust protection against lawsuits used to chill speech

In December of 2010, the D.C. Council passed, with our support, an Anti-SLAPP Act that provides a special procedure for people engaged in advocacy on public interest issues to have a court dismiss SLAPP suits quickly.
Explore Case
Court Case
Oct 25, 2023
Placeholder image
Court Case
Oct 25, 2023
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

United States v. Trump (challenging vague and broad gag order against criminal defendant

Explore Case
Court Case
Sep 07, 2023
Placeholder image
Court Case
Sep 07, 2023
  • Freedom of Speech and Association|
  • +1 Issue

Molina v. Book – Advancing the right to observe police, and challenging qualified immunity doctrine, which shields officials from constitutional accountability

In 2015, police officers shot tear gas at two legal observers with bright green "Legal Observer" hats. The court ruled that words printed on clothing are not entitled to First Amendment protections. Together with the National ACLU and the ACLU of Missouri, we petitioned SCOTUS to review the case.
Explore Case
Court Case
Mar 22, 2023
Placeholder image
Court Case
Mar 22, 2023
  • Equal Protection and Discrimination|
  • +1 Issue

SONMEZ V. WASHINGTON POST – IS AN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLAIM AGAINST A NEWSPAPER A SLAPP?

Explore Case
Court Case
Nov 04, 2021
Placeholder image
Court Case
Nov 04, 2021
  • Police Practices and Police Misconduct|
  • +2 Issues

Cameron v. District of Columbia – Challenging Practice of Needlessly Retaining Arrested Individuals' Cell Phones for Months or Years Without Process

Explore Case
1 2 3 4 5 … 8

Stay Informed

Sign up to be the first to hear about how to take action.

By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy statement.

By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy statement.

  • ACLU National
  • Volunteer
  • Contact Us
  • Donate

© 2025 American Civil Liberties Union

  • User Agreement
  • Privacy Statement
  • Website Accessibility