Featured Cases

Court Case
June 25, 2026
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association|
  • +1 Issue

O’Hara v. Beck – Defending the Right To Protest the National Guard

In Star Wars, the Imperial March is the music that plays when Darth Vader and his storm troopers enter the scene. It’s also the soundtrack of Sam O’Hara’s protest against the National Guard’s presence in D.C. National Guard troops arrived in the District after President Donald Trump deployed them to support local police—an act that Mr. O’Hara views as a violation of centuries-old norms against militarizing domestic law enforcement and a threat to individual freedom. To highlight the surreal danger of the deployment, Mr. O’Hara began walking behind Guard members when he saw them in the community, playing The Imperial March on his phone, and recording. Most community members got the point of the protest, and so did several members of the Guard, who either smiled or laughed in response. Ohio National Guard Sgt. Devon Beck, however, was not amused by the satire. He threatened to call MPD if Mr. O’Hara didn’t stop his protest. When Mr. O’Hara persisted, Sgt. Beck recruited MPD officers to the scene, and the officers proceeded to detain and handcuff Mr. O’Hara, ending his demonstration. The First and Fourth Amendments (not to mention D.C. law) bar government officials from detaining people just because of their speech. Mr. O’Hara is suing to vindicate that principle. Sgt. Beck moved to dismiss the claims against him, arguing among other things that he is entitled to the defense of qualified immunity because he did not violate rights that were "clearly established." That motion remains pending. Meanwhile, in June 2026, the remaining defendants — the D.C. government and its officers — agreed to compensate Mr. O'Hara in exchange for dismissal of the claims against them. Press Release
Court Case
January 12, 2026
Three women federal workers in power poses
  • Equal Protection and Discrimination|
  • +4 Issues

Fell v. Trump (formerly Stainnak v. Trump) - Challenging Purge of DEI-Associated Federal Workers As Discriminatory and Retaliatory for Perceived Political Beliefs

Federal employees filed a complaint against the Trump administration for targeting workers, especially people of color, women, and non-binary workers, for participating in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) activities, violating their First Amendment rights.

All Cases

78 Court Cases
Court Case
September 2, 2010
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Quick, George

Court Case
July 23, 2010
Placeholder image
  • Police Practices and Police Misconduct|
  • +1 Issue

Tuma v. District of Columbia

Court Case
March 5, 2010
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Busking on the Mall

Court Case
December 19, 2009
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association|
  • +1 Issue

Davis v. Billington

Court Case
January 7, 2009
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Flex Your Rights / WMATA

Court Case
March 19, 2008
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Weise v. Jenkins

Court Case
November 1, 2007
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

United States v. Syring

Court Case
December 30, 2006
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Baldwin v. Brizill

Court Case
October 5, 2006
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Moss v. United States Secret Service