Featured Cases

Court Case
June 25, 2026
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association|
  • +1 Issue

O’Hara v. Beck – Defending the Right To Protest the National Guard

In Star Wars, the Imperial March is the music that plays when Darth Vader and his storm troopers enter the scene. It’s also the soundtrack of Sam O’Hara’s protest against the National Guard’s presence in D.C. National Guard troops arrived in the District after President Donald Trump deployed them to support local police—an act that Mr. O’Hara views as a violation of centuries-old norms against militarizing domestic law enforcement and a threat to individual freedom. To highlight the surreal danger of the deployment, Mr. O’Hara began walking behind Guard members when he saw them in the community, playing The Imperial March on his phone, and recording. Most community members got the point of the protest, and so did several members of the Guard, who either smiled or laughed in response. Ohio National Guard Sgt. Devon Beck, however, was not amused by the satire. He threatened to call MPD if Mr. O’Hara didn’t stop his protest. When Mr. O’Hara persisted, Sgt. Beck recruited MPD officers to the scene, and the officers proceeded to detain and handcuff Mr. O’Hara, ending his demonstration. The First and Fourth Amendments (not to mention D.C. law) bar government officials from detaining people just because of their speech. Mr. O’Hara is suing to vindicate that principle. Sgt. Beck moved to dismiss the claims against him, arguing among other things that he is entitled to the defense of qualified immunity because he did not violate rights that were "clearly established." That motion remains pending. Meanwhile, in June 2026, the remaining defendants — the D.C. government and its officers — agreed to compensate Mr. O'Hara in exchange for dismissal of the claims against them. Press Release
Court Case
January 12, 2026
Three women federal workers in power poses
  • Equal Protection and Discrimination|
  • +4 Issues

Fell v. Trump (formerly Stainnak v. Trump) - Challenging Purge of DEI-Associated Federal Workers As Discriminatory and Retaliatory for Perceived Political Beliefs

Federal employees filed a complaint against the Trump administration for targeting workers, especially people of color, women, and non-binary workers, for participating in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) activities, violating their First Amendment rights.

All Cases

78 Court Cases
Court Case
June 29, 2016
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association|
  • +1 Issue

Sandvig v. Barr - First Amendment Challenge to Federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act

Court Case
June 21, 2016
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association|
  • +1 Issue

ACLU v. CIA (pre-publication review FOIA)

Court Case
January 31, 2016
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Hodge v. Talkin

Court Case
January 1, 2016
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Sharpe, John

Court Case
October 15, 2015
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. v. Hogan

Court Case
July 1, 2015
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Matal v. Tam (formerly Lee v. Tam)

Court Case
April 15, 2015
Placeholder image
  • National Security/War on Terror|
  • +1 Issue

Dhiab v. Obama

Court Case
March 6, 2015
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Pro-Football, Inc. v. Blackhorse

Court Case
September 30, 2014
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Kandrac v. The Washington Travel Clinic PLLC