Featured Cases

Court Case
Sep 25, 2025
Placeholder image
  • Police Practices and Police Misconduct|
  • +1 Issue

Escobar Molina v. Dep’t of Homeland Security – Challenging Warrantless Immigration Arrests Without Probable Cause in D.C.

On September 25, 2025, four Washington, D.C. community members and the national immigration organization CASA sued the Trump administration to end its policy and practice of making immigration arrests in D.C. without a warrant and without probable cause. The plaintiffs are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of the District of Columbia, American Civil Liberties Union, Amica Center for Immigrants’ Rights, CASA, National Immigration Project, the Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs, and the law firm of Covington & Burling. Since August, federal officers from multiple agencies have made hundreds of immigration arrests in the District. The officers frequently patrol and set up checkpoints in neighborhoods where a large number of immigrants live and stop and arrest people as they go about their daily lives. The law typically requires an agent to have a warrant when arresting someone for an immigration violation. One exception to the warrant requirement is when the agent has probable cause both that a person is in the United States in violation of the law and is likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained. According to the lawsuit, the Trump administration has a policy and practice of making immigration arrests without a warrant and without an individualized determination of probable cause that the person is in the country unlawfully and that the person is a flight risk. Each plaintiff in the case was arrested, detained, and released. The lawsuit was filed as a class action. The plaintiffs seek a court ruling to prevent the government from conducting such unlawful arrests against them and others in the future. On October 3, 2025, Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification and a motion for a preliminary injunction, to stay agency action, and for provisional class certification to ask the Court to order Defendants and their agents to stop making warrantless immigration arrests without probable cause for flight risk, as required by the Immigration and Nationality Act.
Court Case
Mar 26, 2025
Three women federal workers in power poses
  • Equal Protection and Discrimination|
  • +4 Issues

STAINNAK V. TRUMP – CHALLENGING PURGE OF DEI-ASSOCIATED FEDERAL WORKERS AS DISCRIMINATORY AND RETALIATORY FOR PERCEIVED POLITICAL BELIEFS

Federal employees filed a complaint against the Trump administration for targeting workers, especially people of color, women, and non-binary workers, for participating in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) activities, violating their First Amendment rights.

All Cases

278 Court Cases
Court Case
Sep 01, 2005
Placeholder image
  • Criminal Justice Reform|
  • +2 Issues

Scott v. District of Columbia

Court Case
Feb 01, 2005
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association|
  • +1 Issue

Kaddoura v. Doe

Court Case
Jan 01, 2005
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants' Rights|
  • +4 Issues

Makky v. Chertoff

Court Case
Nov 01, 2004
Placeholder image
  • Criminal Justice Reform

Ricks v. Barnes

Court Case
Jul 01, 2003
Placeholder image
  • Government Employees' Rights|
  • +1 Issue

Leighton v. CIA

Court Case
Jul 24, 2001
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Initiative and Referendum Institute v. United States Postal Service

Court Case
Jun 01, 1997
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

Lederman v. United States

Court Case
Jun 01, 1989
Placeholder image
  • Youth/Childrens' Rights

LaShawn A. v. Bowser