This case arose out of the Patent and Trademark Office’s decision to cancel the registration of the Washington football team’s trademark, “Redskins.” A federal district court in Northern Virginia upheld the PTO’s decision and the team has appealed to the Fourth Circuit. We joined with the National ACLU and the ACLU of Virginia in filing an amicus brief to the Fourth Circuit in this case, which presents the same question as Matal v. Tam: whether Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, which prohibits registration of a mark that “may disparage . . . persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt or disrepute,” violates the First Amendment. After the Court ruled in Matal v. Tam that the disparagement clause of the Lanham Act violates the First Amendment, the Justice Department stopped defending the PTO’s application of the Act here.
Pro-Football, Inc. v. Blackhorse
Date filed
March 6, 2015
Status
Amicus Filed
Related Issues
Related content

Champions of Justice: Get to know the 2023 slate of members of ACLU...
August 28, 2023COURT OF APPEALS DENIES CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS AGAINST FEDERAL...
June 23, 2023
Real Justice Means Healing: Why We Partnered with Network for...
June 14, 2023SONMEZ V. WASHINGTON POST – IS AN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLAIM...
March 22, 2023ACLU-D.C. Files Lawsuit on Behalf of Demonstrator Injured by...
March 14, 2023