• About
    • About Us
    • Issues
    • Careers
    • Volunteer
  • Our Work
    • Know Your Rights
    • Legislation & Advocacy Hub
    • Cases
    • Reports
  • News
    • Press Releases
    • Blogs
  • Get Help
  • Events
  • Donate
    • Become a Member
    • Donate
    • Other Ways to Donate
  • Donate
    • Become a Member
    • Donate
    • Other Ways to Donate

Court Cases

  • Share this page
      • Amicus Filed
      • Closed
      • In U.S. Supreme Court
      • Landmark case
      • Open
      • Victory!
      • Criminal Justice Reform
      • D.C. Statehood
      • Disability Rights
      • Due Process/Procedural Rights
      • Equal Protection and Discrimination
      • Freedom of Speech and Association
      • Government Employees' Rights
      • Immigrants' Rights
      • LGBTQ+ Rights
      • National Security/War on Terror
      • Police Practices and Police Misconduct
      • Privacy
      • Racial Justice
      • Religious Liberty
      • Reproductive Freedom
      • Voting Rights
      • Women's Rights/Gender Equity
      • Youth/Childrens' Rights
    • Amicus Filed
    • Closed
    • In U.S. Supreme Court
    • Landmark case
    • Open
    • Victory!
    • Criminal Justice Reform
    • D.C. Statehood
    • Disability Rights
    • Due Process/Procedural Rights
    • Equal Protection and Discrimination
    • Freedom of Speech and Association
    • Government Employees' Rights
    • Immigrants' Rights
    • LGBTQ+ Rights
    • National Security/War on Terror
    • Police Practices and Police Misconduct
    • Privacy
    • Racial Justice
    • Religious Liberty
    • Reproductive Freedom
    • Voting Rights
    • Women's Rights/Gender Equity
    • Youth/Childrens' Rights

All Cases

266 Court Cases
Court Case
Dec 12, 2023
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

WALLBUILDERS V. WMATA – CHALLENGING METRO POLICY OF BANNING CONTROVERSIAL ADVERTISEMENTS

In this case, we argue that WMATA’s advertising guidelines violate the First Amendment, which prohibits government agencies from discriminating against private speech based on its viewpoint or from applying rules that so vague they can’t be applied consistently.
Court Case
Oct 25, 2023
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

United States v. Trump (challenging vague and broad gag order against criminal defendant

Court Case
Sep 07, 2023
Placeholder image
  • Freedom of Speech and Association|
  • +1 Issue

Molina v. Book – Advancing the right to observe police, and challenging qualified immunity doctrine, which shields officials from constitutional accountability

In 2015, police officers shot tear gas at two legal observers with bright green "Legal Observer" hats. The court ruled that words printed on clothing are not entitled to First Amendment protections. Together with the National ACLU and the ACLU of Missouri, we petitioned SCOTUS to review the case.
Court Case
Aug 10, 2023
Placeholder image
  • Criminal Justice Reform|
  • +1 Issue

Benjamin v. Colbert – Challenging D.C. Jail’s Failure to Provide Religious Dietary Accommodations

The lawsuit, filed as a class action, primarily seeks a court order to prohibit DOC officials from imposing requirements on Jewish people in their custody to provide external verification of their religion as a condition for approving their kosher meal requests.
Court Case
Aug 03, 2023
Placeholder image
  • Disability Rights|
  • +1 Issue

Bread for the City v. District of Columbia – Challenging Discrimination in Mental Health Emergency Response Services

When people in D.C. call 911 for a mental health emergency, it’s generally a Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officer who responds. The District’s reliance on police as its default first responders for mental health emergencies is not only unfair and unsafe but also unlawful.
Court Case
Mar 22, 2023
Placeholder image
  • Equal Protection and Discrimination|
  • +1 Issue

SONMEZ V. WASHINGTON POST – IS AN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLAIM AGAINST A NEWSPAPER A SLAPP?

Court Case
Feb 28, 2023
Placeholder image
  • Due Process/Procedural Rights

Ebosele Oboh v. D.C. Department of Buildings - Excessive Fine Violates the Eighth Amendment

Ebosele Oboh was renovating his house without having obtained the necessary permits. The Department of Buildings issued him a fine for the violation, then doubled the fine as a penalty for not responding to the first. This amicus brief argues that the excessive penalty violates the 8th Amendment.
Court Case
Feb 24, 2023
Placeholder image
  • Disability Rights|
  • +1 Issue

Taylor v. McDonough – The Government Should Take Care of Veterans it Harmed

In 1969, seventeen-year-old Bruce Taylor enlisted in the army and volunteered for a secret weapons testing program at the Edgewood Arsenal in Maryland, where he was used as a human guinea pig in experiments with chemical weapons. As a result, he has suffered from a lifelong health condition.
Court Case
Jan 10, 2023
Placeholder image
  • Equal Protection and Discrimination|
  • +1 Issue

Neloms v. District of Columbia – Challenging D.C. DMV’s Telework Discrimination Against Parents and Caregivers

In December 2022, we filed a complaint with the D.C. Office of Human Rights alleging discrimination based on family responsibilities and seeking compensation for our clients and changes to the DMV telework policy so it does not disadvantage parents and caregivers.
Court Case
Dec 12, 2023
Placeholder image
Court Case
Dec 12, 2023
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

WALLBUILDERS V. WMATA – CHALLENGING METRO POLICY OF BANNING CONTROVERSIAL ADVERTISEMENTS

In this case, we argue that WMATA’s advertising guidelines violate the First Amendment, which prohibits government agencies from discriminating against private speech based on its viewpoint or from applying rules that so vague they can’t be applied consistently.
Explore Case
Court Case
Oct 25, 2023
Placeholder image
Court Case
Oct 25, 2023
  • Freedom of Speech and Association

United States v. Trump (challenging vague and broad gag order against criminal defendant

Explore Case
Court Case
Sep 07, 2023
Placeholder image
Court Case
Sep 07, 2023
  • Freedom of Speech and Association|
  • +1 Issue

Molina v. Book – Advancing the right to observe police, and challenging qualified immunity doctrine, which shields officials from constitutional accountability

In 2015, police officers shot tear gas at two legal observers with bright green "Legal Observer" hats. The court ruled that words printed on clothing are not entitled to First Amendment protections. Together with the National ACLU and the ACLU of Missouri, we petitioned SCOTUS to review the case.
Explore Case
Court Case
Aug 10, 2023
Placeholder image
Court Case
Aug 10, 2023
  • Criminal Justice Reform|
  • +1 Issue

Benjamin v. Colbert – Challenging D.C. Jail’s Failure to Provide Religious Dietary Accommodations

The lawsuit, filed as a class action, primarily seeks a court order to prohibit DOC officials from imposing requirements on Jewish people in their custody to provide external verification of their religion as a condition for approving their kosher meal requests.
Explore Case
Court Case
Aug 03, 2023
Placeholder image
Court Case
Aug 03, 2023
  • Disability Rights|
  • +1 Issue

Bread for the City v. District of Columbia – Challenging Discrimination in Mental Health Emergency Response Services

When people in D.C. call 911 for a mental health emergency, it’s generally a Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officer who responds. The District’s reliance on police as its default first responders for mental health emergencies is not only unfair and unsafe but also unlawful.
Explore Case
Court Case
Mar 22, 2023
Placeholder image
Court Case
Mar 22, 2023
  • Equal Protection and Discrimination|
  • +1 Issue

SONMEZ V. WASHINGTON POST – IS AN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLAIM AGAINST A NEWSPAPER A SLAPP?

Explore Case
Court Case
Feb 28, 2023
Placeholder image
Court Case
Feb 28, 2023
  • Due Process/Procedural Rights

Ebosele Oboh v. D.C. Department of Buildings - Excessive Fine Violates the Eighth Amendment

Ebosele Oboh was renovating his house without having obtained the necessary permits. The Department of Buildings issued him a fine for the violation, then doubled the fine as a penalty for not responding to the first. This amicus brief argues that the excessive penalty violates the 8th Amendment.
Explore Case
Court Case
Feb 24, 2023
Placeholder image
Court Case
Feb 24, 2023
  • Disability Rights|
  • +1 Issue

Taylor v. McDonough – The Government Should Take Care of Veterans it Harmed

In 1969, seventeen-year-old Bruce Taylor enlisted in the army and volunteered for a secret weapons testing program at the Edgewood Arsenal in Maryland, where he was used as a human guinea pig in experiments with chemical weapons. As a result, he has suffered from a lifelong health condition.
Explore Case
Court Case
Jan 10, 2023
Placeholder image
Court Case
Jan 10, 2023
  • Equal Protection and Discrimination|
  • +1 Issue

Neloms v. District of Columbia – Challenging D.C. DMV’s Telework Discrimination Against Parents and Caregivers

In December 2022, we filed a complaint with the D.C. Office of Human Rights alleging discrimination based on family responsibilities and seeking compensation for our clients and changes to the DMV telework policy so it does not disadvantage parents and caregivers.
Explore Case
1 … 3 4 5 … 30

Stay Informed

Sign up to be the first to hear about how to take action.

By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy statement.

By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy statement.

  • ACLU National
  • Volunteer
  • Contact Us
  • Donate

© 2025 ACLU of the District of Columbia

  • User Agreement
  • Privacy Statement
  • Website Accessibility